Injector Module Upgrade - Sputtering with LPG

Diskutiere Injector Module Upgrade - Sputtering with LPG im Prins Forum im Bereich Autogas Anlagen; Hallo, I would write this in Deutsche, but the results would be hilarious. More important to get the idea across. Yesterday I upgraded my VSI...

  1. #1 Quantum, 26.09.2009
    Zuletzt bearbeitet: 26.09.2009
    Quantum

    Quantum AutoGasInteressent

    Dabei seit:
    25.09.2009
    Beiträge:
    13
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    Hallo, I would write this in Deutsche, but the results would be hilarious. More important to get the idea across.

    Yesterday I upgraded my VSI system from the Injector Simulator version A to version B. I had originally installed the VSI system flawlessly, and do know what I'm doing, but the version A started showing a Check Engine with open/shorted injector... its classic failure mode.

    I used the solder-in wiring harness for the new IM (6 cyl), and was pretty careful with my work. It was unclear from the drawings what to do with the Injector Module's Ignition wire, so I left it not connected.

    The car starts fine and runs great on petrol, and it even switches to LPG. But that's where the trouble begins. The engine slows and misses, going blurp-de-blub-blup-blurp and dies. It's as if I had the LPG injector plugs switched, but I do not. Also there's a loud rushing of air coming from the air intake venturi, only in LPG mode, which I find is coming from the air bypass caused by the motor opening wide. Connecting the IM's Ignition line has made no difference at all.

    I am confident that my wiring is correct, as it runs fine on petrol and owing to the very invasive nature of this kit, I believe that it confirms my work.

    Looking at the diagram, there is something that does not make sense:
    [​IMG]
    The Injector Simulator is supposed to be active low, and so in petrol mode the ignition signal (a high) is supplied to the control (#26). What is supposed to happen is in petrol mode, the MOSFET is forward-biased, passing along the ECU's signal to the petrol injectors. However the MOSFET depicted is forward-biased with a low on the gate (arrow pointing toward gate). But low is supposed to be LPG mode. This error is disturbing.

    Anyway, in LPG mode the MOSFET is shut off, so current from the ECU is shunted through the resistor and much reduced, so the petrol injectors do not operate. So what role do the vertical ECU lines play in the IM? Are these now active? Are these merely sense lines to tell the LPG computer what the car ECU thinks? Could I have switched two of these in my delirium?

    In LPG mode the engine splutters and puts out black soot (incomplete combustion). My leading suspicions are that:
    - The petrol injectors are not being turned off in LPG mode; or
    - I switched two or more of the ECU lines;
    - The LPG ECU needs a firmware upgrade for the version B IM.

    It's implausible that I got my wiring wrong, as it runs so well on petrol.

    I need to understand the differences between operation in petrol and LPG modes in detail, so I can try and ascertain why it works well in petrol, but poorly in LPG mode. Any input appreciated.
     
  2. Anzeige

  3. #2 AHMueller, 27.09.2009
    AHMueller

    AHMueller AutoGasMeister

    Dabei seit:
    26.07.2007
    Beiträge:
    877
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    Did you check lambda in lpg mode? If it is always rich the petrol injectors are not being turned off.

    "solder-in wiring harness" means the one with connector or the one without connector? There is solder-in wiring harness which has a connector on it to plug the new IM in. If thats the one you've used and lambda is always rich, e.g. petrol injectors are not turned off, check the connector because 26 might not be plugged in correctly.

    And yes, you are right low = lpg, high = petrol. The IM should have #cylinders * 3 + 3 wires. For every cylinder you have:
    1 from petrol ecu
    1 to petrol injector
    1 to gas ecu

    + ground, sim & ignition. Did you check that petrol, injector and gas ecu wires are correctly wired up? The diagram you have is actually quite old, omitting the ignition wire required by the version of the IM module.

    Hope this helps,
    - tobias
     
  4. #3 Quantum, 28.09.2009
    Zuletzt bearbeitet: 28.09.2009
    Quantum

    Quantum AutoGasInteressent

    Dabei seit:
    25.09.2009
    Beiträge:
    13
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    I haven't run Winduhs for some years (Debian), and the VSI software is Winduhs only. But I will try to install it in Wine and see whether it works, and check lambda and other parameters.

    The wiring harness I have does have the connector at the IM, but all the rest is solder-in. I am guessing that lambda will be all over the place, as from millisecond to millisecond it seems to be starved for fuel, and then there is black soot.

    So it seems the diagram is incorrect for the MOSFET. I was very careful with soldering in the wires one-by-one, but the writing on the old wires was smeared and very difficult to read, and by the time I got to the ECU sense lines I was exhausted and may have made a mistake. This will be difficult to confirm though, with the smeared writing and the lines all being yellow/white. I know that my injector wiring is correct, as it runs fine on petrol. It's the sense lines that I am suspicious of.

    So it sounds like the IM's Ignition wire should indeed be connected to ignition? Is there a newer instruction document?

    I am a bit concerned as the part numbers in my document do not match those on the IM. I actually got the IM over a year ago, and the wiring harness a month ago. Has there been more than one version of the version B IM?

    Why is there an advantage to leaving the petrol injectors hot and only reducing the current? The install doc emphasizes this, but does not explain why it is good. It is quite a departure from the old way. Maybe it's because, rather than trying to simulate the injectors' presence to the car ECU with circuitry, the current that does flow is enough to satisfy the ECU that all's well and results in a simpler (and {cough} more reliable) IM?
     
  5. #4 Quantum, 29.09.2009
    Quantum

    Quantum AutoGasInteressent

    Dabei seit:
    25.09.2009
    Beiträge:
    13
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    I have now positively confirmed that all my sense lines (IM to ECU) are correct. Now confirming other connections.

    Also I notice on the old diagram that ECU 50 was not connected and in the new it is.
     
  6. #5 Quantum, 29.09.2009
    Zuletzt bearbeitet: 29.09.2009
    Quantum

    Quantum AutoGasInteressent

    Dabei seit:
    25.09.2009
    Beiträge:
    13
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    Joy, joy.

    I have found the problem. Amongst the last connexions I made the other day was the grounds. I now find that I had connected the IM GND and LPG ECU #54 to +BAT rather than -BAT. I had traced it to the car battery, but failed to check the marking (POS) and thought it was NEG. Yes the wire was red, but such was my state of exhaustion at that point.

    So today I've corrected that, and the car runs perfectly now. No more Check Engine light, and a beautiful switch from that oily-smelly-shit-that-puts-out-alot-of-smoke, to LPG. I am running on moonbeams again! So nice to be gazzy, and burning a waste byproduct for motive fuel.

    It's a miracle I didn't burn some electronika out, but then again it's pretty hard to burn out a MOSFET...
     
  7. #6 sixpack@8, 03.10.2009
    Zuletzt bearbeitet: 03.10.2009
    sixpack@8

    sixpack@8 AutoGasInteressent

    Dabei seit:
    02.07.2008
    Beiträge:
    23
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    Hello Quantum,
    fine to hear it finally went all well.

    I tried to follow your posting and it seems we both have a connection in terms of an circuit issue.

    Let me try to explain,
    I'm currently building up the system for an V8 engine (part by part, which took currently a few mounths ;)) based on the circuit plan you've shown here - this means the petrol injectors all have (permanently) Ignition + Signal.
    Only the Minus will be passed through the IM.

    This is the way I planned the system and built it up - means I have a self made refurbished engine wire harness, were 1) Ignition+ and 2) all the cylinder wires per Cylinder "-" are looped out to a special selfemade connector.

    Now my question, I once asked this here in the forum, but still not got an adequate answer.
    I also know about at least two different sorts of IM's, but I fear that I have got the false ones for this sort of circuit - I have confirmed that the cables on the prins wire harness are in the way as shown here.

    Would you please be so kind to have a look to the IM you have; do the part # start with "091/..."?

    I fear I have the same problem as you without having completly intalled the system :D

    I think I just need to get the newer IM's identified with part number "180/..." starting.

    Perhaps you can lead me to a better understanding,
    thanks in advance,

    Sixpack@8
     
  8. #7 Quantum, 03.10.2009
    Zuletzt bearbeitet: 03.10.2009
    Quantum

    Quantum AutoGasInteressent

    Dabei seit:
    25.09.2009
    Beiträge:
    13
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    Hello Sixpack, the numbers on my IM are 091/71006 and A/40/07/0905. (maybe 9 May 07? or 40th week of 07? I got it shortly after that) Keep in mind that I bought my LPG ECU about 4 years ago, so it may be well-suited to the 091 part.

    Wow, a self-made engine harness. Lots of opportunity for mistakes. Please consider buying an engine harness from a junkyard and just modifying that. The modification is less complex now, than it was with the version A IM. If you need an actual Prins harness I suggest checking with various importers. Portugal wanted E210, while Athens wanted E18! For the same IM harness! Of course you must be working in the country of the importer.

    Presumably you know that for an 8 cylinder, you use two 4cyl IM's, and their Ground and Ignition wires are commoned together. The sense lines of the two IMs would be connected to bank 1 and bank 2 of four cylinders each, respectively.

    What symptoms are you getting?
     
  9. #8 sixpack@8, 04.10.2009
    Zuletzt bearbeitet: 04.10.2009
    sixpack@8

    sixpack@8 AutoGasInteressent

    Dabei seit:
    02.07.2008
    Beiträge:
    23
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    Hi,
    you are finished with your work, but you are still around here, great!

    I'm a bit unconsious because I worked according the plan (rev. B) but on the prins illustriation there is always shown the according module # 180/... but I got the IM's (2x4Cyl) with the # as you have ... "091/..."

    Currently I do not have problems as electrically nothing is online ;-)
    I'm still installing the system.
    I'm now very unsure to connect anything to power. When I look at the prins shematics, it looks like the old IM's with leading # 091 have only 9 pins - 4x 2 each (+ and - for the respective petrol injectors) and 1 to the ground (prins #54).
    The newer ones with #180/... have per each Cyl 3 connectors plus additional the ground line (prins #50) and the Simulation Low (prins #26).

    What I'm sure about is that the prins harness is rev. B.

    This damn IM's with #091 do make me crazy, they more likely look as they were optically of the #180 design, as they have the appropriate numbes of pins, and also the connector of the harness fits to them.

    The source of all my concerns is, as I worked according the rev. B plan, which means, I did not interupt the plus line of the petrol injectors which is as one action obviously in conclusion with the #091 IM's now necesarry.

    As I mentioned, I build up the original engine harness with new silicon cables because it was very yunky but I did that very very carefully and I'm sure I did not build in any mistake.
    Currently the engine runs another 30000km's with this newly build up harness on petrol without any problem.
    It would be a pitty if I'd need to rework that again, because of the false IM's, thats my faer!

    Have I got you in the right way, that you now have a new revision B harness combined with the IM of the type "091/..."?

    Sorry, I'm too much confused, because I maybe do not understand the plan, it looks like the polarity of the IM's changed.

    To just summarize:
    I have harness rev. B
    I have IM's (1 per each bank) of type "091/..."
    I did not interrupt the Ign line +(15) to the petrol injectors and the other modifications shown in the prins modification shematic, which exists, but is not shown on your shematic (maybe I should give you a PN with that plan)

    Does this work? I'm sure not!

    Conclusion in my eyes:
    Easiest way to go with
    1) Rev. B harness
    2) exactly lined up as shown in your plan (not interrupted + line for the petrol injectors and all other electrical modifications)
    3) IM's of type "180/..." instead of the type "091/..."

    which is then just straigt forward w/o any modification of my engine harness (interruptet + line to the petrol injectors); I wonder, why I got the IM's of type "091/..." :confused:

    I mean, I got the system mid of 2008, so I assume buying a complete engine kit with harnes rev. B has to include the newer IM's of type "180". I think I need to stress for that, what do you mean?
     
  10. #9 Quantum, 04.10.2009
    Zuletzt bearbeitet: 04.10.2009
    Quantum

    Quantum AutoGasInteressent

    Dabei seit:
    25.09.2009
    Beiträge:
    13
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    I suggest that the 180 is compatible with the 091. The connector is the same, and they almost certainly would have made the connector different if incompatible. I suggest that you not worry about this until proven otherwise.

    No, interrupting the + injector line is not what you do with the 091 IM nor the 180. The + line is connected, as from the car factory, with either part#. The only petrol injector wire you interrupt is -. One wire from the IM goes on the injector side, and the other on the petrol ECU side. That is the only tampering you do with the engine wiring harness.

    Then you must connect the IM sense lines to the respective yellow/white LPG lines.

    OK, so it seems your custom engine harness is verified good? It runs well on petrol? And you have the IMs wired into it?

    Yes, I have a brand-new IM harness which I just got a month ago from Prins, installed on my 091 IM, and it works great. The harness has an Ignition wire which is unaccounted for in the drawing, but I did connect it to Ignition and it made no difference in the operation. I suspect that it is not connected with the 091 module, but it is with the 180, so machs nichts.

    However, I understood that your car is not operational, yet you've driven it on petrol? Did you mean that it is not operational on LPG? Have you tried it on LPG? If so, what was the result?

    No, polarity of the IMs did not change; I merely connected it wrong, and that was the source of my problems. When I corrected it, mine works great now.

    This is not clear. I don't understand what you are saying.

    I agree with all of this except 3. I believe that 091 and 180 are interchangeable.

    I do not understand why you think you have a problem? Is the car not running at all on LPG? It is running on petrol? Does it ever try to switch to LPG? If so, how does it behave?
     
  11. #10 sixpack@8, 04.10.2009
    sixpack@8

    sixpack@8 AutoGasInteressent

    Dabei seit:
    02.07.2008
    Beiträge:
    23
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    you got PM

    Hi,
    I think you need to get a more concrete picture to get an idea, why I got so confused. Please have a look to your Message folder.

    If you look to the right, you see also the 091-IM, whereas to the left you see the 180-IM.

    Currently I do not yet have a problem, as I have still not finished my work.
    I never tried to start with lpg as not yet all is connected.

    The big fear I have is that when false connected I burn some electronic.
     
  12. #11 Rabemitgas, 04.10.2009
    Rabemitgas

    Rabemitgas Meister der Beiträge
    Moderator

    Dabei seit:
    02.02.2007
    Beiträge:
    13.885
    Zustimmungen:
    128
    Wir können uns gerne mal auf einen Tee treffen und dann englisch reden.

    aber hier ist Deutschland!!:D:D:D (Spass)
     
  13. #12 sixpack@8, 04.10.2009
    sixpack@8

    sixpack@8 AutoGasInteressent

    Dabei seit:
    02.07.2008
    Beiträge:
    23
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    ...na heiße ich Westerwelle ;) der geht aber auch momentan gut :)

    wenn's nicht so weit wäre, würde ich das auch machen, aber english reden ist dann nicht :D Tee ist ok:]
     
  14. #13 Quantum, 05.10.2009
    Quantum

    Quantum AutoGasInteressent

    Dabei seit:
    25.09.2009
    Beiträge:
    13
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    My Deutsche would be laughable to you guys. Hey, I'm just tryin' to help the guy. V8gaser gave me the vitally important information I needed to make mine run, and I am just trying to 'pay it forward'.

    Sixpack, yes I have that diagram too. But remember that the module on the right is not the version B IM. It is the old version A which originally came with the kit. That drawing is irrelevant to you. Please consider only the one I'd posted at the top hereto.
     
  15. Anzeige

  16. #14 sixpack@8, 05.10.2009
    Zuletzt bearbeitet: 05.10.2009
    sixpack@8

    sixpack@8 AutoGasInteressent

    Dabei seit:
    02.07.2008
    Beiträge:
    23
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    Many Thanks for 'paying forward', do not feel offended, as no one wants.

    Ok,
    I feel much better now, because I wanted to do a really perfect job on my project.

    To come back to the diagram, as there is 'by chance?' the 091# shown in conjuction with the old rev. A, I thought #180 stands for Rev. B and #091 stands for rev. A.

    In other words it does not matter wether to have #180 or #091 IM's (interchangebility assumed) as long they are for Rev. B (there must be another identifier for rev. A or B)??
     
  17. #15 Quantum, 06.10.2009
    Quantum

    Quantum AutoGasInteressent

    Dabei seit:
    25.09.2009
    Beiträge:
    13
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    Right, there is one 091 part# for the rev A IM and another 091 part# for the rev B IM. And now there is a 180 part# for the rev B IM.

    I do not know though, whether there is an interaction with the ECU related to part numbers. If your LPG ECU is a 180 maybe your IM must be a 180 as well. However it seems doubtful as the IM's connector would have been different, if the 091 and 180 parts were incompatible.
     
Thema: Injector Module Upgrade - Sputtering with LPG
Besucher kamen mit folgenden Suchen
  1. prins emulator schaltplan

    ,
  2. prins injection module

    ,
  3. prins vsi wiring diagram

    ,
  4. prins wiring diagram,
  5. prins vsi diagram,
  6. injector emulator,
  7. injector emulator circuit,
  8. prins lpg wiring diagram,
  9. injection module prins,
  10. prins vsi schaltplan,
  11. INJECTOR SIMULATOR,
  12. Prins VSI Emulator Schaltplan,
  13. Schaltplan Prins vsi,
  14. prins lpg diagram,
  15. Vsi prins mosfet,
  16. prins injector module,
  17. module injectos prins vsi,
  18. injector emulator schematic,
  19. injektor gasoline schema,
  20. prins emulator,
  21. Emulator Prins Schaltplan,
  22. prins injection module 4 cylinder,
  23. prins emulator anschlussplan,
  24. wiring diagram lpg,
  25. prins injection module schemat
Die Seite wird geladen...

Injector Module Upgrade - Sputtering with LPG - Ähnliche Themen

  1. Störung trotz Injector tausch

    Störung trotz Injector tausch: Hallo Leute, meine Prins VSi 2.0 bei meinem 2012 Dodge Challenger SRT8 geht nach ein Paar Metern auf Störung, vor ein Paar Wochen reichte es erst...
  2. Welche Kabelschuhe für Keihin KN8 Injector

    Welche Kabelschuhe für Keihin KN8 Injector: Hallo zusammen, ich benötige Kabelschuhe für die Stcker meiner VSI 1 Keihin Injectoren. Komplette Stecker gibt es in der Bucht, ich brauche aber...
  3. Prins InjectorCare Alternative

    Prins InjectorCare Alternative: Guten Abend zusammen, Kommende Woche bekomme ich von Jens Rankers meine VSI 3.0 in den 2.0 TSI (190 PS) eingebaut. Prins empfiehlt ja wohl alle...
  4. Injector circuit malfunktion – cylinder 3

    Injector circuit malfunktion – cylinder 3: Moin moin Habe seit kurzem das Problem das bei meinen V8 ( Prinz VSI II) die Einspritzdüse des 3te Zylinder bei Benzin von der Gasanlage nicht...
  5. Vorstellung und gleich Frage zum Dream XXI 6 zyl injector

    Vorstellung und gleich Frage zum Dream XXI 6 zyl injector: Moin an alle !! ich bin neu hier und habe bereits viel gelesen und zur LPG Technologie mit OMVL Technik am 6 zyl. 125 kW 3 Liter injector an...